|
Proposed Code Change Number
|
Recommended
Action
|
Comments
Even though
Ohio
does not use the administrative sections of the I-codes, this is a
standard that is reference in it’s entirety and we should look at
provisions of Chapter 1.
|
Impact
|
|
FG1-06/07
|
AS
|
Clarifies the fact in Chapter 1 that there is
often utility piping inside the building and in this case the code
only apply to certain specific things.
|
Very Little
|
|
FG2-06/07
|
AM
|
I would recommend adding the words “listed
and labeled” before appliances.
|
Coordination of codes.
|
|
FG3-06/07
|
D
|
102.11 Confusing. I do not agree that all
I-codes must have the same administrative sections.
|
Nothing added
|
|
FG4-06/07
|
D
|
It scares me to allow the usage of “other
Nationally recognized safety standards, as approved”. We have a
specific standards approval process in
Ohio
.
|
Would give a blank check to standards that have
not been reviewed
|
|
FG5-06/07
|
D
|
Simply to provide correlation with other codes
does not justify this or any other change. Each change should stand
on it’s own merit for the specific code it is in.
|
Nothing added
|
|
FG6-06/07
|
D
|
See FG3 & FG5 above
|
Nothing added
|
|
FG7-06/07
|
D
|
We should not and do not have this authority in
Ohio
|
Inconsistent enforcement probability
|
|
FG8-06/07
|
D
|
This has significant added text to the permit
process. Again it is an effort to have the same verbiage for all
codes in the administrative section.
|
Sections like this make me thankful we do not
use the administrative sections from ICC!
|
|
FG9-06/07
|
D
|
See FG8
|
|
|
FG10-06/07
|
D
|
See FG8
|
|
|
FG11-06/07
|
D
|
This section addresses installations that are
temporary in nature. It is a new section.
|
I think we already have this authority.
|
|
FG12-06/07
|
AS
|
This is a good change
|
Helps to clarify the appliance/equipment
definitions.
|
|
FG13-06/07
|
AS
|
This defines terms used in the code.
|
Consistent with IMC
|
|
FG14-06/07
|
AS
|
These devices are used by utilities instead of
shut off valves at the street
|
Defines a device commonly used
|
|
FG15-06/07
|
AS
|
Adds water heaters as well as boilers to the
volume requirement of the room.
|
Presently not defined.
|
|
FG16-06/07
|
D
|
Ohio
cannot use this section for approval of unlisted equipment.
|
|
|
FG17-06/07
|
D
|
This change would allow appliances to be
located in other closets such linen closets, etc.
|
Fire hazard
|
|
FG18-06/07
|
AM
|
We need to add “outdoors” to clarify that
the impact protection must be provided inside the building even for
“lawn Maintenance equipment”.
|
Obviously this proposal comes from some
enforcement somewhere.
|
|
FG19-06/07
|
AS
|
Addresses areas that are not addressed in this
code. These were clearly covered when gas appliances were a part of
the mechanical code.
|
Good change!
|
|
FG20-06/07
|
AS
|
This modification is more practical than the
present code language.
|
Good Change!
|
|
FG21-06/07
|
AS
|
This has been common practice for years.
|
No problem with this change.
|
|
FG22-06/07
|
D
|
As worded, I think this opens doors for
potential safety concerns.
|
Safety concerns
|
|
FG23-06/07
|
AS
|
The existing language could be a potential
safety hazard if applied literally.
|
Addresses potential safety issues
|
|
FG24-06/07
|
AS
|
Addresses redundant language.
|
Cleans up code
|
|
FG25-06/07
|
AS
|
Completes the thought in FG24.
|
Cleans up code
|
|
FG26-06/07
|
D
|
In favor of 25 above.
|
|
|
FG27-06/07
|
AS
|
This is a practical application of materials
|
Outdoor application should pose no safety
issues.
|
|
FG28-06/07
|
AS
|
Good change if standard holds up to review.
|
Clarification of wording
|
|
FG29-06/07
|
AS
|
Most listed devices (eg valves have reduced
area.)
|
Any issues that result are already being
addressed in system design.
|
|
FG30-06/07
|
AS
|
I see more justification for this change than
the proponent listed. Often the shut off valve is better placed
after the trap.
|
No safety issues
|
|
FG31-06/07
|
D
|
In favor of FG31 above.
|
|
|
FG32-06/07
|
D
|
In favor of FG33
|
|
|
FG33-06/07
|
AS
|
Cleans up language that is applied many
different ways.
|
Easier application of this code section
|
|
FG34-06/07
|
AM
|
I would recommend that
a valve be placed within 6 feet of the gas outlets for each table,
bench or hood. As worded, one shutoff by the egress door is all that
is required for the entire lab. What if there are two egress doors?
|
Good proposal if
location of the valves is addressed.
|
|
FG35-06/07
|
AS
|
We now have the potential for plastic piping
being used for vent piping
|
Good addition to code. Safety issue.
|
|
FG36-06/07
|
D
|
This should already be done under present code
|
(listing) Redundant
|
|
FG37-06/07
|
D
|
This should be placed with the shutoff valves,
not regulators.
|
Wrong location in the code.
|
|
FG38-06/07
|
D
|
This should already be done under present code
|
(listing) Redundant
|
|
FG39-06/07
|
AS
|
See proponent’s reason.
|
Practical change
|
|
FG40-06/07
|
AM
|
Delete proposed exception #1, keep #2 prefer 41
|
#2 practical change.
|
|
FG41-06/07
|
AS
|
Addresses issues presented in #40, but expands
to allow for the safe use of other connector means.
|
Good change
|
|
FG42-06/07
|
D
|
Not necessary if installed in accordance with
listing and manufacturer’s installation instructions.
|
Adds unnecessary and often requirements that
are not practical
|
|
FG43-06/07
|
?
|
I don’t know if we should regulate the
connections to portable appliances downstream of the shutoff valves.
|
|
|
FG44-06/07
|
AS
|
Section needed to address appliance service,
replacement and removal
|
Common practice, but needs to be stated.
|
|
FG45-06/07
|
AS
|
Includes reference to existing requirements in
this section.
|
Additional reference to existing code
requirements.
|
|
FG46-06/07
|
AS
|
Much better format
|
Clarifies intent
|
|
FG47-06/07
|
D
|
Part of listing and manufacturer’s
installation instructions. There are listed supports for this, not
just “wire”.
|
Could conflict with listing
|
|
FG48-06/07
|
AS
|
Good safety proposal.
|
See reason
|
|
FG49-06/07
|
AS
|
Corrects an error in the code.
|
Life safety issue
|
|
FG50-06/07
|
AS
|
Good addition if standard withstands review.
|
Needed standard
|
|
FG51-06/07
|
D
|
Safety devices are required as a part of the
listing. This should be addressed at the manufacturer’s level.
|
Not necessary
|
|
FG52-06/07
|
?
|
Not sure we could enforce this one.
|
|
|
FG53-06/07
|
D
|
This does not address the possibility of burns
resulting from the elevated temperatures in the front of the
appliance.
|
Right idea, needs some work.
|
|
FG54-06/07
|
AS
|
Safety issue
|
Safety issue
|
|
FG55-06/07
|
D
|
Standards should be added when referred to by a
code section.
|
Not usable
|
|
FG56-06/07
|
AS
|
Important to use current information.
|
Updates critical. Often contain new technology.
|